🗒 Summary
Ana joined us from SAPI - a 40-person fintech startup - to share how she built a full recruitment engine from scratch with a team of two, zero agency spend, and a £23k annual tool budget. The last two years? 👉 46 hires, £478k saved in agency fees, 87% offer rate, only 2 people failing probation, and only 2 receiving a “below expectations” in their first performance review.
📡 What She Walked Into
👉 Nothing was there when she joined No process, no framework, no culture foundation. The leadership team was haemorrhaging people. First 3-4 months were a listening tour - understanding problems before touching anything.
👉 She had to make some deliberate exits too Once the desired culture was defined with the founders, she and the founders made active decisions about who fit and who didn't. Not all attrition was a problem to solve - some of it was intentional.
👉 Founder alignment was non-negotiable Ana was clear: she joined SAPI because she connected with the CEO. She'd left a previous startup after a month because that alignment wasn't there. It's the foundation everything else is built on.
👉 Every new leader challenged the model Each time a new hire joined the leadership team, she had to defend her approach again. Her answer was always the same: here are the stats, here's the time I'll save you, ask everyone in the business how hiring has gone. The numbers did the worked as proof.
⚡ The Engine She Built
Team: Two people. Ana and Linh, who she hired with no recruitment experience and trained from scratch.
Budget: £23k all-in. Covers HRIS, ATS (Workable), ScreenLoop for interview notes, LinkedIn Recruiter, occasional use of Juicebox, and Flexa for employer brand.
The process:
- Linh handles sourcing, first CV screen, and initial screening call. Target: every 3 candidates passed to Ana, 1 should be outstanding.
- Ana runs a one-hour structured interview: structured communication, analytical mindset, clarity of thought, cognitive ability, collaboration, and ambition. See below for her example questions she swears by
- Maximum 5 stages total (screening, Ana's interview, two founders, hiring manager). More often 4.
- No take-home tasks. Ever.
- One-week maximum SLA to get back to every candidate, promised in the first call.
Scheduling: Done by a human, not AI. Linh personally books every interview. Ana's view: in a world full of AI touch points, a human voice saying "good luck, let me know if you need anything" is a competitive advantage.
First email to candidates: Includes Glassdoor, Flexa, careers page, company values, benefits, and photos. The sell starts before the first conversation.
Rejection protocol: Email if they only met Linh or Ana. A call with verbal feedback if they've met anyone in the wider leadership team.
✅ What You Should Do: A Practical Step Plan
1. Lead with commercial credibility before you lead with HR Make your promise to the founders and hiring managers about saving their time, not improving their process. 2-3 hours of their time per hire, maximum. If you start there, you earn the right to run hiring your way.
2. Build a two-tier screening process and protect your own diary Let a trained team member handle sourcing and first screens. Be deliberate about the quality bar for what reaches you. 87% offer rate is a product of being selective at every stage - not generous.
3. Put a hard cap on interview stages 5 maximum. If hiring managers want more, send them back to rewatch the ScreenLoop recording. Every unnecessary stage is a candidate you're going to lose and a hiring manager's goodwill you're spending.
4. Never use a take-home task It damages candidate experience, and the signal you get rarely justifies the drop-off. If you can't assess someone in a structured interview, fix the interview.
5. Sell the company in the first email Don't wait until offer stage to pitch why someone should join. Your first outreach email should include everything: company story, values, benefits, what it looks like to work there. Candidates are deciding on you before you've decided on them.
6. Use humans for interview scheduling Tools exist. Use them sparingly. A person who proactively clears diary space and sends a warm message before every interview is doing something no automation tool replicates.
7. Track quality of hire through probation and first perf review Probation pass rate and first performance review outcomes are your two metrics. Own the result for the first year. If someone fails, that's your data to learn from.
8. Over-index on employer brand Post everything on LinkedIn - promotions, new starters, awards, recognition. Find a partner (Flexa in Ana's case) who will champion you. Get out and speak publicly. Employer brand is what gets 91% offer acceptance - it's not a nice-to-have.
9. Build a leadership team that reflects the world your candidates live in 43% of SAPI's leadership team is female. Their leadership team of 7 has 7 nationalities. This isn't incidental - it shows up in how the business attracts and retains diverse talent. If your employer brand promises diversity, your leadership team needs to evidence it.
💬 Q&A Highlights
How do you define and track quality of hire? Two data points: probation pass rate (6-month probation at SAPI), and meets/exceeds expectations at first performance review. Ana takes personal accountability for hire quality through the first year. Out of 46 hires: 2 didn't pass probation, 2 didn't meet expectations at first review.
Is tracking quality of hire for a full year too long? No. For a startup people leader, your job isn't just to hire well - it's to make those people a success in the business. A year gives you meaningful signal.
Can you trust AI CV scoring? Ana's answer: test it before you trust it. When Workable first introduced scoring, it made enough mistakes that she and Linh continued screening manually for the first few months. It improved. Now they use it as a filter at 50%+ rather than a decision-maker. The bar isn't whether AI is perfect - it's whether it's better than an overstretched human, and increasingly it is.
What about screening hundreds of CVs at volume? Use the ATS score as a triage tool, not a gatekeeping tool. Set a reasonable threshold rather than a high one. And remember: candidate experience is half of employer brand. Everyone who interviews with a leader in your business deserves a call and verbal feedback, not just an email.
📚 Ana’s Interview Questions
- Ana’s Interview Questions Mentioned In Session
- Question 1: Overcoming Failure
- "Tell me about a time when you experienced a failure. Looking back, what would you do differently to ensure a successful outcome? Please structure your answer into five key instances or sequences."
- Question 2: Supporting Teammates
- "Give me an example of a time when a colleague needed your help. How exactly did you support them? Please organize your response into five key steps."
- Question 3: Handling Feedback
- "Describe a time when you received constructive feedback. Please explain, in three key steps, how you used that feedback to improve yourself."
- Question 4: Managing Stakeholders
- "Share an example of a time when you successfully impressed a key stakeholder. What was the situation, and what specific actions did you take?"
- Question 5: Communication & Simplicity (The 5-Year-Old Test)
- "How would you explain what our business does to a five-year-old child?"
- > Interviewer Note (Backup Prompt): If the candidate struggles to explain your specific business, pivot to: "Imagine you are talking to a five-year-old child. Please explain what the business you currently work for (or have worked for in the past) actually does."
- Question 6: Conflict Resolution & Team Dynamics
- "Imagine you are working on a four-person project team. During a status update with the team lead, one of your colleagues takes credit for the entire group's work. How would you handle this situation? Please organize your answer into seven key steps."
- Question 1: Overcoming Failure